The Supreme Court has granted a 5-4 ruling that stops Michigan from suing to block an off-reservation casino. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The principles casinos that are governing by Native American tribal groups are varied and complex, depending on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles throughout the country, including one which ended up being just settled in the greatest court associated with land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of a casino that is indian as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. Your choice was a divisive one, as the justices had been split 5-4 in favor of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino in mind of Case
The truth revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe built in 2010 about 90 miles south of its reservation, that is positioned on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with money it received as part of funds with the federal government over allegations they gave up in 19th century treaties that they had not been properly compensated for land.
Because the casino was constructed on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its operation was in violation of these state compact and without permission from the state or federal governments (more…)